today I add my voice to the on-going debate on the campaign finance reform bill that is before us once again. Let me say right up front, so that there is no confusion, I support, and I have always supported enforceable, reasonable, common-sense reform. Unfortunately, I don't believe the amendment offered by Senators McCain and Feingold before the Senate meets those standards, nor do I believe it would stand a Constitutional challenge. As I stated with my friend and fellow Coloradan, Senator Allard, in a joint editorial printed in the Denver Post back in October, "real campaign finance reform protects the right to free speech under the First Amendment while guaranteeing the public's right to know through full disclosure." This amendment does not contain that kind of reform. The Constitution guarantees all Americans the right to freedom of speech and association in the First Amendment. The Supreme Court applied those words to campaign spending in the landmark case Buckley v. Valeo to mean that money spent in favor or against a candidate is a form of speech, and therefore entitled to this protection. That decision has been reinforced over and over again. Given this ruling, I cannot believe that the Court, or the Founding Fathers, intended to impose a sixty- or thirty-day moratorium prior to elections on this right, as this amendment would do.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “today I add my voice to the on-going debate on the campaign finance reform bill that is before us once again. Let me say…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the campaign finance reform bill and its constitutional implications.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
May I inquire as to how much time I have remaining. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman has 2 minutes remaining.
I thank the gentleman from Colorado. I understand the point. Some individual Members, I believe, did introduce--the House didn't per se--but did introduce some charges, if you will, against President Bush. The point I am simply trying to…
As identified during the last amendment, we have debt, we have deficit, we need to look for things in the Department of Defense as well where we can look for efficiencies and expense reductions and still defend the country. Currently in…
Your office will have a large role in implementation, so I’m assuming that your office is at the table as the Legislature considers this.





