But let us call it that. Shall we have limits to how much money potentially can corrupt our campaign system or not? A very legitimate different point of view from mine, but a very legitimate point of view, says no, let us not have any limits on campaign finance. That is actually the view I think espoused by the distinguished Whip. But it is contrary to the whole idea of campaign finance reform. If we are for limiting the potentially corrupting influence of money, as we have in the law now, by a $1,000 maximum, then we should not create a loophole so huge as to permit the example that I gave to my friend from California, as I gave to my distinguished colleague and friend, the Whip from Texas.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “But let us call it that. Shall we have limits to how much money potentially can corrupt our campaign system or not? A…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing campaign finance reform and the need for limits on campaign contributions.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
This decision will have severe consequences in Massachusetts, where thousands of TPS holders fill critical roles in our healthcare and elder care industries.
I’m smiling because folks will just file bills and say, ‘Who’s going to enforce it?’ ‘The AG, of course,’ and we’re never asked, we’re never engaged.
Neither President Trump nor his Secretary have the power to demolish a congressionally-created department, and as Attorney General but most importantly as a mom, I will continue to hold this Administration accountable for illegal actions…
Today's victory protects the integrity of the H-1B visa program as a tool to address severe labor shortages in vital industries like education, healthcare, and medical research.





