If one needs a reminder as to why we must make the Hate Crime Statistics Act mandate permanent, one need look no further than today's headlines. Throughout the South, Federal and State authorities are investigating a rash of arson against African-American churches reminiscent of the violence perpetrated three decades earlier. In California, a native American was brutally stabbed by skinheads. My home State of Colorado has not been immune from the scourge of hate violence. In Morrison, CO, a swastika was burned on a woman's lawn. While in Aurora, a man shot his neighbor with a BB gun because of hatred for his Asian neighbor. In 1995, the Southern Poverty Law Center's Klanwatch Project counted 267 active hate groups in the United States including 6 in Colorado. And, in 1994, because of the passage of the Hate Crimes Statistics Act, law enforcement agencies in the United States were able to identify 5,852 hate crimes. Hate crimes are a growing problem--one that cannot merely be measured by numbers alone. If we are going to be successful in our battle against the scourge of violent hate crime, one thing is certain--we must have hard, reliable, information about the nature and the scope of the problem. Mr. President, this bill calls for a permanent mandate for the collection of hate crime data by the Justice Department.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “If one needs a reminder as to why we must make the Hate Crime Statistics Act mandate permanent, one need look no further…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need to make the Hate Crime Statistics Act permanent during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
I’m smiling because folks will just file bills and say, ‘Who’s going to enforce it?’ ‘The AG, of course,’ and we’re never asked, we’re never engaged.
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California will be postponed. {time} 2130 It is now in order to consider amendment No. 55…
I thank the gentleman from Colorado. I understand the point. Some individual Members, I believe, did introduce--the House didn't per se--but did introduce some charges, if you will, against President Bush. The point I am simply trying to…
Your office will have a large role in implementation, so I’m assuming that your office is at the table as the Legislature considers this.





