I voted in favor of this amendment when it stood separately. I now will vote against it. Why? Since it passed before, we do not need it to be attached to this bill for its substance. The only reason it is being attached to this bill now is to defeat Shays-Meehan. Why? Because Shays-Meehan has to stay as close to identical to what passed or came close to passing with 57 votes in the Senate for cloture. Do not support this amendment if you are committed honestly to campaign finance reform. The further Shays-Meehan departs from what could pass in the Senate, the less our chance.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “I voted in favor of this amendment when it stood separately. I now will vote against it. Why? Since it passed before, we…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the amendment related to campaign finance reform during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
That is what we are about here in Massachusetts. And frankly that`s what Democrats are about -- not political stunts but helping people with a sense of empathy and compassion.
I don't know if you've been to Spain or not, but I have, just once. It's a beautiful country--nice people, great food, and at one time a large, vibrant, and growing economy, but not today. Today in Spain, over half of the people under 25…
Massachusetts is the medical research capital of the country. We are the proud home of nation-leading universities and research institutions that save lives, create jobs, and help secure a better future. We will not allow the Trump…
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California will be postponed. {time} 2130 It is now in order to consider amendment No. 55…





