I voted in favor of this amendment when it stood separately. I now will vote against it. Why? Since it passed before, we do not need it to be attached to this bill for its substance. The only reason it is being attached to this bill now is to defeat Shays-Meehan. Why? Because Shays-Meehan has to stay as close to identical to what passed or came close to passing with 57 votes in the Senate for cloture. Do not support this amendment if you are committed honestly to campaign finance reform. The further Shays-Meehan departs from what could pass in the Senate, the less our chance.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “I voted in favor of this amendment when it stood separately. I now will vote against it. Why? Since it passed before, we…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the amendment related to campaign finance reform during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
Because we now do not have a partner at the federal level looking to advance consumer protection, more of these cases now fall on us.
Even though the Court did not dispute that the Trump Administration’s decision to cut critical medical and public health research is illegal, they ordered the recipients of that funding — hospitals, researchers, and the state — to jump…
Your office will have a large role in implementation, so I’m assuming that your office is at the table as the Legislature considers this.
One thing I think we demonstrated in the first 100 days of this administration — and continue to — is that we are organized, we are strategic, and we’re unafraid to take on what’s coming, whether that be unlawful executive orders or…





