I rise in support of H.R. 4201, the Noncommercial Broadcast Freedom of Expression Act of 2000. While this is indeed a good bill, I am frankly disappointed that it is necessary. It is necessary to correct a gross blunder by the FCC and to prevent it from ever happening again. Earlier this year, in the WQED Pittsburgh station case, a television transfer case, the FCC sought to quantify the service obligations of noncommercial television licenses by requiring that 'more than half of the hours of programming aired on a reserved channel must serve an educational, instructional, or cultural purpose in the station's community of license.' But they went on to say that while programming which teaches about religion would count toward that new benchmark, programming that was 'devoted to religious exhortation, proselytizing, or statements of personally held religious views and beliefs' would not. In short, the Commission was drawing substantive distinctions between what religious message would qualify in the content of that station's broadcasting.
William Tauzin: “I rise in support of H.R. 4201, the Noncommercial Broadcast Freedom of Expression Act of 2000. While this is indeed a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Noncommercial Broadcast Freedom of Expression Act of 2000 and FCC regulations on religious programming.
Share
More from William Tauzin
let me make the most important point here. Environmentalists for years have argued that we ought to have environmental laws that require the polluter to pay, that the polluter ought to be responsible for cleaning up his act and that the…
let me first pay special thanks and appreciation to the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Baker) who has worked tirelessly this week to try to find some rational amendment to this bill that made it somewhat better for those of us who represent…
let me first indicate that, of course, I am rising in strong support of H.R. 2898, the E-911 Implementation Act of 2003. House bill 2898 has already passed the House Committee on Energy and Commerce; and it did so unanimously, as one might…
I am proud to rise in favor of S. 313, the Animal Drug User Fee Act (``ADUFA''), sponsored in the House by my good friend from Michigan, Mr. Upton. This legislation, modeled after the successful Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), is…





