Let me reassert two facts that I hope should be abundantly clear. First of all, the basis on which we amend it as it comes out of committee does not affect State actions. To take water rights away from people, local actions to do that are not covered by this bill. So the State of Colorado, if it wants to take water away from people, is going to have to answer in some other court regarding that action.
William Tauzin: “Let me reassert two facts that I hope should be abundantly clear. First of all, the basis on which we amend it as it…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill on state actions regarding water rights.
Share
More from William Tauzin
ETBE is included within the definition of a renewable fuel. The conference report attempts to provide maximum flexibility to the refining marketplace to achieve the goals of both the new renewable fuels requirement and, therefore, ETBE is…
In fact, we have been asked so many times, is this a free-speech issue. The United States Constitution gives you the right to speak; it does not give you the right to be heard. None of us have an obligation to listen if we do not want to…
Mr. Speaker, let me again emphasize this is extraordinary. The court decision came out yesterday. The leadership of this House authorized this bill to the floor today. We are about to pass this bill, I believe the Senate is about to do the…
CBO's estimates now indicate that this bill makes oncologists perfectly whole in this first year of the changeover. In fact, for the first 2 years, it is a neutral completely, and oncologists will be getting something like 22 o 3 times…





