let me reassert two facts that I hope should be abundantly clear. First of all, the basis on which we amend it as it comes out of committee does not affect State actions. To take water rights away from people, local actions to do that are not covered by this bill. So the State of Colorado, if it wants to take water away from people, is going to have to answer in some other court regarding that action.
William Tauzin: “let me reassert two facts that I hope should be abundantly clear. First of all, the basis on which we amend it as it…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill on state actions regarding water rights.
Share
More from William Tauzin
I can only tell the gentleman it was an embarrassing moment and, again, I apologize to both of them. But the gentleman knows we have heard this bill in committee, and he knows how absolutely aggravated people get with these calls. They…
Mr. Speaker, for the second time in just a few months, Congress is on the verge of passing watershed consumer protection legislation. Less than 2 months ago, we enacted, in record time I might add, legislation that codified the ability of…
let me first pay special thanks and appreciation to the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Baker) who has worked tirelessly this week to try to find some rational amendment to this bill that made it somewhat better for those of us who represent…
Mr. Speaker, after a very long and important debate, the American people will finally, finally get a comprehensive energy policy worthy of the challenges that they face. Everyone on both sides of the aisle and both sides of the Capitol…





