I rise in defense of this institution. If my colleagues think this institution already belongs to special-interest groups because of the money that flows into politics, then dare they turn this institution to outside groups, who can hold each one of them hostage with a threat of an ethics complaint in order to get their way on this House floor? If they want to turn this body over to the outside groups, vote against the Murtha amendment. That will do it. If they want to preserve in this House our own obligation to police ourselves, then vote for the Murtha amendment.
William Tauzin: “I rise in defense of this institution. If my colleagues think this institution already belongs to special-interest…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the importance of self-regulation in Congress during debate on the Murtha amendment.
Share
More from William Tauzin
Let me reiterate again, the motion to instruct, to all Members of the House who are paying attention to this debate, basically says to the Senate and House conferees: accept the Senate language, take the Senate bill, take the Democratic…
yes, it does. And it is a little complex, so let me try to explain. Briefly the requester would, in fact, pay the same transmission cost as any other transmission customer. The embedded cost language simply clarifies that in the up-front…
Mr. Speaker, for the second time in just a few months, Congress is on the verge of passing watershed consumer protection legislation. Less than 2 months ago, we enacted, in record time I might add, legislation that codified the ability of…
I got a letter from the Congressional Budget Office indicating that they prepared a preliminary estimate of the impact of the Democratic amendment to H.R. 1, the Democratic plan; and the estimate of CBO of their plan is $1 trillion. So a…





