my concern, beyond the procedural elements that have been referred to here just a moment ago, is the perceived effect of the amendment as I have read it. Although I understand the author's intention is to only limit the appropriation of funds from a particular area by Treasury to the Comptroller with regard to prohibition of new activities in insurance, the construction of the amendment, as I view it today, is to prohibit any new product, regardless of insurance or other wise, if it were not otherwise permitted by July 16 of this year. That was the reason for the unanimous consent request to modify.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about an amendment related to funding and new product prohibitions.
Share
More from Richard Baker
Does the gentleman mean these people are telling us if somebody goes to work they want them to be able to keep the money?
We are characterizing local public housing authorities across this country as people who do not care about those people. By and large, are not most of these individuals who serve on these authorities either very low paid or volunteers…
I would like first to commend the gentleman from Louisiana for his efforts in this matter and point out that there is one other aspect of this amendment I think most important. The debate to date has been centered about the effect of…
I just want to point out, it has again been missed, that housing director after housing director after public housing authority board member has contacted Members of this Congress and said, ``Please, give us some relief from the Brooke…





