In the process of putting together this legislation which we introduce today, I had the occasion to speak to a number of people in the law enforcement community in our State, as well as individuals who have been touched in some way or another by the crack cocaine epidemic. There are two or three points I would like to enter into the Record at this point, in conjunction with our legislation, that are drawn from some of the comments I have heard. One of them I have already mentioned, and that is the concerns local law enforcement people have that if we change the crack minimum mandatory threshold at the Federal level, it will create a problem in our State, and probably in a lot of other States where there are very tough mandatory minimums for crack dealing, because it will give people who are criminal defendants the option of going into the Federal system to avoid tough State-level penalties. I don't think we want to do that.
On the recordMay 5, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about changes to crack cocaine sentencing laws during legislative debate.
Share
More from Ralph Lee Abraham
Jun 22, 2022
I would bring to the nations of ASEAN a message that is really centered in our shared commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific.
Sep 12, 2018
For me, this is a jobs issue. We should not allow the heavy hand of the Federal Government to come down and crush an entire industry.
Sep 12, 2018
I'm a physician by trade, and I was taught very early in medical school when you review a scientific article to look at the author, whether there's bias or not, and look at the sample size.
Feb 27, 2017
The commodity title, specifically, Price Loss Coverage, is the cornerstone of our safety net because of its ability to provide certainty over multiple years for farmers.





