I will quickly summarize. My amendment is designed to accomplish two things: To begin an effort to privatize the NEA so it can be as large as it wants to be and as liberated from the strings which Congress has attached to it as it wants to be. I believe this is feasible and I think it would take away from us, finally and once and for all, this ongoing debate between obscenity and censorship. Let the arts be free and creative and at the discretion of an independent entity. At the same time, my amendment would provide new funding to try to maintain and restore such treasures as the Star Spangled Banner, the works of our great composers, Presidential papers, Ellis Island, and Mount Rushmore. By moving in this direction, if my amendment passes, I will be offering a sense-of-the-Senate amendment which would incorporate the privatization concept, and then begin working on a variety of mechanisms by which I believe we in Congress can legislatively assist a private entity to thrive and be successful.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to privatize the National Endowment for the Arts and provide new funding for cultural treasures.
Share
More from Ralph Lee Abraham
I'm a physician by trade, and I was taught very early in medical school when you review a scientific article to look at the author, whether there's bias or not, and look at the sample size.
If there is going to be any change in the status of our participation in JCPOA especially when--if it involves the interpretation of what we, in Congress, pass in terms of sanctions against Iran outside the JCPOA, will you come back and…
I would bring to the nations of ASEAN a message that is really centered in our shared commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific.
If we don't address the relationship between what we are trying to do in the American Space Commerce Free Enterprise Act and the FAA AST, I fear we might be setting FAA AST up for failure.





