Mr. President, I rise today with the Department of Defense, the U.S. Strategic Command, the United States Navy, the Commander of the Atlantic Fleet Submarine Force, the Wisconsin State Conference of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the Wisconsin and Michigan District of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, and the Upper Peninsula Building and Construction Trades Council, in opposing the amendment offered by my friend from Wisconsin, Mr. Feingold. Because our time is limited, I will get right to the point. The program which is defined in this amendment as the ELF program is of critical importance to the United States military. It has been for many years, and continues to be today, even in this post-cold-war environment. No other system can replace it, and if we eliminate it, our submarines will be forced to operate at lower speeds, shallower depths, less maneuverability, and will therefore be more vulnerable to detection and attack from hostile forces. Last year, the Commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, General Habiger, told the Senate Armed Services Committee: As the only system capable of communicating with submarines operating deep beneath the ocean surface, ELF is key to enhancing the security and flexibility of that submarine force.
On the recordJune 25, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to the ELF program during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Ralph Lee Abraham
Mar 26, 2019
Extreme weather events and the shifting of tidal patterns and coastlines are impacting communities throughout the Indo-Pacific region.
Apr 26, 2017
Even the FAA doesn't know really what to do with all the drones. There are more drones on the civilian side now than there are aircraft flying.
Oct 2, 2017
If there is going to be any change in the status of our participation in JCPOA especially when--if it involves the interpretation of what we, in Congress, pass in terms of sanctions against Iran outside the JCPOA, will you come back and…
Jan 9, 2017
Let me add from a national security perspective, we want--no, make that we must have nuclear superiority.





