This is an important point to clarify. The violation of this act is not the performance of an abortion. The violation of this act is the transportation of a minor across state lines to obtain an abortion without involving that minor's parent as required by the law of her home state. The abortion provider would only be in violation of this act if the provider actually conspired to transport or assisted in transporting the minor across state lines to obtain an abortion without the parental involvement that the minor's home state required. Providers who had not engaged in any such activities related to the transport of a minor would not incur any criminal liability or face any new legal responsibilities under this legislation. Mr. President, I rise today to offer my strong support for the Child Custody Protection Act of 1998, which would make it a crime to transport a child across state lines to circumvent a state law requiring parental involvement or a judicial waiver for a minor to obtain an abortion.
Ralph Lee Abraham: “This is an important point to clarify. The violation of this act is not the performance of an abortion. The violation of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Child Custody Protection Act of 1998.
Share
More from Ralph Lee Abraham
If we don't address the relationship between what we are trying to do in the American Space Commerce Free Enterprise Act and the FAA AST, I fear we might be setting FAA AST up for failure.
I understand the current interpretation of the law is that military malpractice is an incident to military service. I mean, that shocks me, as a combat infantry Marine.
The best way forward for the United States to maintain its leadership position in space exploration utilization is to support our Nation's work and investment in rocket propulsion.
as important as all those are, I think we are all smart enough to understand that that makes no difference if we don't have a country and national security.





