Mr. President, this, to me, should be a pretty clear-cut result. The States entered into this litigation. They did all the work. They made the case persuasively. They were finally able to prevail on the merits, in terms of convincing the other side to engage in a settlement. So, for those reasons, it does not seem to me to be particularly difficult to conclude that the benefits, the proceeds, the settlement moneys ought to go to the States. I believe, since the States did this on their own and since the States are certainly quite knowledgeable about the needs of their constituents, that we should allow them not only to be the recipients of those funds but we should give them the discretion to make the decisions that are necessary as to what priorities to set in spending those dollars.
On the recordMarch 17, 1999
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the allocation of funds from a legal settlement between states and tobacco companies.
Share
More from Ralph Lee Abraham
Jul 13, 2016
I mean, it's beyond the pale that we wouldn't want to detect an insider threat.
Feb 27, 2017
The commodity title, specifically, Price Loss Coverage, is the cornerstone of our safety net because of its ability to provide certainty over multiple years for farmers.
Jan 9, 2017
The best way forward for the United States to maintain its leadership position in space exploration utilization is to support our Nation's work and investment in rocket propulsion.
Apr 29, 2019
I understand the current interpretation of the law is that military malpractice is an incident to military service. I mean, that shocks me, as a combat infantry Marine.





