Mr. President, this, to me, should be a pretty clear-cut result. The States entered into this litigation. They did all the work. They made the case persuasively. They were finally able to prevail on the merits, in terms of convincing the other side to engage in a settlement. So, for those reasons, it does not seem to me to be particularly difficult to conclude that the benefits, the proceeds, the settlement moneys ought to go to the States. I believe, since the States did this on their own and since the States are certainly quite knowledgeable about the needs of their constituents, that we should allow them not only to be the recipients of those funds but we should give them the discretion to make the decisions that are necessary as to what priorities to set in spending those dollars.
Ralph Lee Abraham: “Mr. President, this, to me, should be a pretty clear-cut result. The States entered into this litigation. They did all…”
On the recordMarch 17, 1999
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the allocation of funds from a legal settlement between states and tobacco companies.
Share
More from Ralph Lee Abraham
Jun 26, 2018
It would have been substantially more helpful for DHS to have been present today, to be part of the dialogue, inform the American public, and answer questions about their work in this area.
Sep 12, 2018
I'm a physician by trade, and I was taught very early in medical school when you review a scientific article to look at the author, whether there's bias or not, and look at the sample size.
Sep 12, 2018
For me, this is a jobs issue. We should not allow the heavy hand of the Federal Government to come down and crush an entire industry.





