It seems to me, in the absence of a fuller examination, it would really be a mistake for the Members of the Senate to vote to remove, effectively repeal section 907 unless they know more of the background that the Senator just discussed. I urge colleagues who are not on the floor and maybe are not following this as closely to just take note of that list and other similar kinds of lists of concerns that have been raised and very serious charges that have been leveled against the government that we would now, in effect, set in motion a potential plan to support. It seems to me this is the kind of issue that requires far greater scrutiny by the Members of the Senate before we would take that action.
Ralph Lee Abraham: “It seems to me, in the absence of a fuller examination, it would really be a mistake for the Members of the Senate to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for careful consideration before voting on the repeal of section 907.
Share
More from Ralph Lee Abraham
It would have been substantially more helpful for DHS to have been present today, to be part of the dialogue, inform the American public, and answer questions about their work in this area.
Extreme weather events and the shifting of tidal patterns and coastlines are impacting communities throughout the Indo-Pacific region.
I understand the current interpretation of the law is that military malpractice is an incident to military service. I mean, that shocks me, as a combat infantry Marine.
So if the EPA imposes these regulations that eliminate the cost-competitive option like these glider kits, is it safe to assume that the price for new trucks would go up?





