If there is no further business to come before the Senate, I ask unanimous consent that it adjourn under the previous order. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the Senate stands adjourned until 9:30 a.m. tomorrow, unless the Senate receives a message from the House that it has adopted S. Con. Res. 60, in which case the Senate stands adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, November 26, 2012, under the provisions of S. Con. Res. 60. Thereupon, the Senate, at 6:01 p.m., conditionally adjourned until Friday, November 16, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. =========================== NOTE =========================== On page S6873, November 15, 2012, the Record reads: Thereupon, the Senate, at 6:01 p.m., adjourned . . . The online Record has been corrected to read: Thereupon, the Senate, at 6:01 p.m., conditionally adjourned . . . ========================= END NOTE ========================= ____________________
Share
More from Mary Landrieu
I would like to take 1 minute now and then we are going to ask for some additional time. I want to thank the Senator from North Dakota for her really clear and direct explanation of this and her practical approach to what we do here. It is…
I ask unanimous consent to have up to 5 minutes. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. ____________________
With all due respect, I say to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle: let's let local law enforcement and the elected officials in city government do their job, and we should focus on ours.
I generally support the goals of the enhancements to the FAST Act, and do believe, as Senator McCaskill said, that having--and both of you--a permanent director, a budget, a staff to give some strength to what you all are trying to do.





