It is unclear why the Interior would propose a categorical exclusion for FWS's listing under the Lacey Act, based upon the premise that those listings will have no environmental impact when, by statute, all wildlife that is proposed to be listed under the Lacey Act must be shown to have an injurious environmental impact.
Fleming questions the rationale behind a proposed categorical exclusion concerning environmental impact.
Share
More from John Fleming
I demand a recorded vote. The CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Louisiana will be postponed. {time} 0020 Amendment Offered by Mr. Huffman
November 20 of this year marks 30 years since President Ronald Reagan signed a proclamation declaring the rose as the National Floral Emblem of the United States of America. The rose takes its rightful place as one of our Nation's symbols…
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, those words are inscribed in the Declaration of Independence among our inalienable rights, but the most important is life itself. As a physician who has delivered hundreds of babies, a father of…
waiting 45 minutes for a response for a health care facility even one time is a disgrace.
Other voices in this conversation
