It is interesting. The gentleman argues that-- amazingly--somehow a chaplain is not going to be open to serving the spiritual needs of all, whether they be gay or otherwise. There is nothing in this amendment that says anything about the choice of one's sexual partner whatsoever. In fact, remember that we already have in our chaplaincy Wiccans, Buddhists, Muslims, Christians, and Jews. Many of those accept same-sex marriages. This argument that the gentleman makes is for another debate, not for this one. This deals purely with atheism. It is very interesting because the scene is that, on the battlefield, you have a chaplain who is serving the spiritual needs of a dying soldier and the soldier asks the chaplain: What happens now? What happens after my death? The answer from the atheist chaplain is: There is nothing for you after death. That is really a very disturbing thought, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Share
More from John Fleming
Congresswoman, budgets are about priorities, and this administration has a different set of priorities than the last one.
Isn't the problem, in fact, it doesn't matter how much money you throw at, it doesn't matter who you put in charge, if you don't hold people accountable for their actions or lack of actions, you are never going to get good results.
I find this unsettling, because it is the security of our economy and job system that makes our country the land of the American Dream.
November 20 of this year marks 30 years since President Ronald Reagan signed a proclamation declaring the rose as the National Floral Emblem of the United States of America. The rose takes its rightful place as one of our Nation's symbols…





