Political Quotes

On the recordMarch 2, 2011
If the gentlewoman would yield, I think that we have to be really clear here that this is not a valid substantive debate. I think that we tend to want to address substantive arguments to refute the misinformation that you describe. This is an ideological debate that is about one thing only, and it is about busting up the union. It's an ideological debate. It's about privatizing a pension system. It's an ideological debate that says that services can be provided better in the private sector. So I think we have to be very clear here that if this were a valid substantive debate, then I think that the workers of Wisconsin would win on that. This is an ideological battle. It's an ideological battle that's rooted in tearing apart, slashing and burning public sector workers under the ruse, under the guise of balancing a budget.
Said by
John Bel Edwards
Democratic · Louisiana
Source
govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 2011

Editor's note · Context

The speaker addresses the ideological nature of the debate surrounding public sector unions and pension privatization.

Share

More from John Bel Edwards

Sep 18, 2024

I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I rise today on behalf of my constituents in western North Carolina to highlight the dire situation at our southern border and to advocate for the enforcement of our Nation's immigration…

govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 2025

We are patrolling, and there will be consequences for breaches of the law.

bbc.com
Jun 25, 2025

there is a lot of noise coming from the other side claiming that House Republicans are cutting Medicaid with our commonsense work requirements. Let me be clear: That is just not true. You can't cut something from someone who was never or…

govinfo.gov
Dec 11, 2023

I thank my bipartisan co-lead, the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Norcross) for his partnership on this act. Building codes regulate new construction and major renovations, setting minimum standards for homes and commercial structures to…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation