In answer to the Senator's question, not only under this amendment the employer couldn't be held accountable, in fact the HMO couldn't be held accountable because they would both be exempted from the legislation. So the family and the patient would be completely left out. That was my point earlier in responding to the Senator, in my comment that this is an extreme response. We have a response, both in our legislation and legislation on which the Senator has been very actively involved, that provides adequate protection, will make sure small employers are protected, but does not punish almost half the families in the country.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing accountability in healthcare legislation during a Senate debate.
Share
More from John Bel Edwards
this big, beautiful bill delivers on two of our Nation's urgent priorities. It secures our southern border and unleashes American energy independence. It invests nearly $70 billion to finish the border wall, expand surveillance technology…
We witnessed this week a remarkable baseball contest. In the Congressional Baseball Game, the Republicans defeated the Democrats 31-10, but, Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate and recognize some real baseball talent. I rise today to…
Today, I was unavoidably detained due to a flight delay, but below is how I would have voted. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll Call No. 233 and YEA on Roll Call No. 234. personal explanation
that is why I fought to include two provisions that bring real oversight and real answers. First, the United States Postal Service is now directed to report to Congress within 90 days with a concrete plan to reopen and restore service…





