There was a discussion yesterday in this Senate Chamber about the issue of employer liability. The Senator from Tennessee suggested, a few minutes ago, he thought the intent of both bills was to protect employers from liability. I agree with that. I know that is the intent of our bill. And I know, from my discussions with the Senator from Tennessee, that is the intent of his bill. We have gone about it in different ways. We believe our bill in fact protects employers. We believe our bill is totally consistent with the President's principles, to which the Senator from Tennessee made reference earlier. The President, in his principles, specifically said employers should not be subject to lawsuits--I don't have the language in front of me, so I am paraphrasing--unless they actively engage in making medical decisions. That is exactly what we intend our bill to do and we believe our bill does; that employers are protected from lawsuits unless they in fact make medical decisions. Having said that, this is another issue on which I think we should continue our discussion...
On the recordJune 20, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing employer liability in relation to proposed legislation.
Share
More from John Bel Edwards
Dec 11, 2024
At this time the Chair recognizes Former Members of Congress President, the Honorable Barbara Comstock, for remarks.
Jan 14, 2026
I ask the chairman of the committee to please accept my compliments for all he has done to help make appropriations great again. I have certainly enjoyed watching the statesmanship, the bipartisanship, and the bringing of the…
Dec 10, 2025
this year's NDAA strengthens America's military readiness. It invests in cutting-edge defense capabilities. It ensures our servicemembers have the training, tools, and support they need to confront the growing threats that we face at home…





