I strongly disagree with the notion that the 1964 Civil Rights Act clearly made it legal for faith-based groups in America to accept millions, and now in this case billions of Federal dollars, and say, We are not hiring you because you are Jewish or because you are Catholic, or because you are Baptist, or because you are Muslim. And I do not think we have to totally revisit the 1964 Civil Rights Act; I think we could just come here on the floor of the House and have an up-front debate. It is very simple. It is, Do you believe that it is okay for groups to discriminate in job hiring using tax dollars, based on no other reason than that person's personal religious faith? I am confident that the vast majority of Americans do not like religious discrimination.
John Bel Edwards: “I strongly disagree with the notion that the 1964 Civil Rights Act clearly made it legal for faith-based groups in…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the implications of the 1964 Civil Rights Act on religious discrimination in hiring practices.
Share
More from John Bel Edwards
once again, Democrats are distorting the truth to smear a bill that protects working-class Americans. They scream: Tax cuts for billionaires. Yet, not a single personal income tax rate from the Trump tax cuts is being changed, tax cuts…
We witnessed this week a remarkable baseball contest. In the Congressional Baseball Game, the Republicans defeated the Democrats 31-10, but, Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate and recognize some real baseball talent. I rise today to…
Ronald Reagan said: ``Democracy is worth dying for because it is the most deeply honorable form of government ever devised by man.'' Madam Chair, that is but one of the reasons I rise today in support of H.R. 8035. At this moment, the…
I ask the chairman of the committee to please accept my compliments for all he has done to help make appropriations great again. I have certainly enjoyed watching the statesmanship, the bipartisanship, and the bringing of the…





