I do not think there is a difficulty with the gentleman's amendment now that it has been amended. We have 202 programs, we have Section 8 programs. They go to Jewish organizations, they go to Catholic organizations, they go to Protestant organizations right now. They cannot discriminate. They cannot discriminate and say, you must be a Catholic, you must be Jewish, you must be a Muslim, you must be a Protestant in order to become a tenant in this organization. They do not discriminate, they cannot discriminate, under these laws with respect to hiring practices, too. I do not think this gentleman's amendment accomplishes that much, but I do not think it changes anything. It does not hurt that much, either. I think we are making a big argument out of a relatively small matter.
John Bel Edwards: “I do not think there is a difficulty with the gentleman's amendment now that it has been amended. We have 202 programs…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to discrimination in housing programs.
Share
More from John Bel Edwards
The Chair thanks and congratulates Chairwoman Bice. The Chair now invites two former Members, Dennis Ross of Florida and Cheri Bustos of Illinois, to offer remarks.
At this time the Chair recognizes Former Members of Congress President, the Honorable Barbara Comstock, for remarks.
I don't want to pre-judge how we might look at the Imgur and Reddit matters, but if there are age limits for accessing services, then the platforms have to enforce those in some ways.
Thank you, Mrs. Comstock, for this report. More importantly, thank you for your thoughtful and exemplary leadership of this outstanding organization. The Chair thanks the former Members of the House for your presence here today. On behalf…





