I represent the largest populated Army installation in America, cochair the House Army Caucus, and in my opinion the Army does not need this job. The Army does not want this job, the Army cannot afford this job, and the Army should not have this job. To give the military, the military, a major role in American domestic affairs, is a major change in long-standing national policy. To pass it under any circumstances, I think is wrong. To pass it without a hearing by the National Security Committee is absolutely irresponsible. Mr. Speaker, there are two more serious problems caused by this amendment. First, it undermines our national security. The job of the U.S. Army is to train soldiers to fight battles and win wars. In the last several years, we have downsized the active duty Army from 18 divisions to 10 divisions. We could not even fight Desert Storm the same way today as we did just a few years ago. Yet to take 10,000 Army soldiers out of training, out of combat training, and put them on the borders, along brush country in Texas and Arizona and California, is absolutely the same as downsizing the Army by 10,000 soldiers. Some may want to do that in this Chamber; I certainly do not. The second problem is this: The average Army soldier spends 138 days away from his or her family. I met a young soldier in my district recently who missed the birth of his first two children because of deployments.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a proposed amendment affecting the role of the Army in domestic affairs.
Share
More from John Bel Edwards
once again, Democrats are distorting the truth to smear a bill that protects working-class Americans. They scream: Tax cuts for billionaires. Yet, not a single personal income tax rate from the Trump tax cuts is being changed, tax cuts…
Today, I rise on behalf of my constituents in western North Carolina to demand accountability for the Biden administration's continued inaction at our southern border. After more than 7.9 million illegal immigrant encounters in only 3\1/…
I thank Chairman Smith for his leadership on this important piece of legislation. During the pandemic, Congress created three new unemployment benefits and issued $675 billion in benefits to folks who lost their jobs because of the…
Had I been present, I would have voted AYE on Roll Call No. 392. ____________________





