If you were to take 1 year, 1 year of LNG that was sent, liquefied natural gas or natural gas that was supplied to Europe, supplied to the European Union from Russia, from Vladimir Putin, and replaced it with U.S. LNG, you would have somewhere around a 215 million-ton reduction in emissions.
Graves highlights the environmental benefits of replacing Russian LNG with U.S. LNG.
Share
More from Garret Graves
The reason that we purchased Alaska was largely the geography, as well as the natural resources, and the abundance of that State is profound and just critically important.
Congresswoman Peltola has been a big advocate and supporter in educating the committee and following in the footsteps of Congressman Don Young in advocating for that State.
In closing, naming the House Press Gallery after Frederick Douglass is going to honor his commitment to the free press, his legacy, and his work reporting on the official business of Congress. I urge support of House Resolution 137, and I…
Other voices in this conversation
