I point out, as regretful as that incident was when all those people died because of the heat, not one of them was saved by the existing LIHEAP program which is in full operation today. The LIHEAP program did not do them any good. Second, the B-2 bomber, a $13 billion investment, is estimated may end up saving us well over $640 billion over the long haul because of its payload. This is the weapons system for the future. It really has no place in this debate, because that is talking about the defense of this Nation.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the effectiveness of the LIHEAP program and the B-2 bomber during a debate.
Share
More from Edward Livingston
I congratulate him and the gentleman from Wisconsin for the outstanding job that they have done on bringing this most extraordinarily difficult bill thus far. The fact is, as has been just said by the gentleman from Wisconsin, we currently…
I just want to be absolutely clear. If Members think for some reason that it might be a good idea to vote for the motion to recommit and they happen to be in the majority, or, in the alternative, if they were to vote against the bill and…
Mr. Chairman, actually this amendment is offered by the gentleman from Maryland [Mr. Cardin] and myself in bipartisan fashion. Basically it serves to overcome an anomaly that might have been created were it not adopted, in that the…
I want to offer my most sincere and hearty congratulations to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Isakson) as he embarks on this wonderful opportunity to serve the people of his State and the people of this country in the United States…





