On the recordMay 16, 2014
The legislation would remove some aspects of federal oversight under the FPA that potentially could cripple the many benefits provided by the Project.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Vitter emphasizes the need for legislation to alleviate federal regulatory burdens on the project.
Share
More from David Vitter
Jun 7, 2016
That is an important question Senator Inhofe and I appreciate the opportunity to clarify. The Lautenberg bill tries to address the concern about forcing paralysis by analysis in several ways. First, the bill establishes that `unreasonable…
Dec 5, 2016
I rise today to speak on the Senate floor for the last time. I am not generally big on nostalgic reminiscences, but I would like to briefly reflect on what is clearly the greatest honor of my professional life--my 12 years in the U.S…
Jun 7, 2016
When TSCA was first enacted in 1976, the Act created a higher level of judicial review for certain rulemakings that would restrict chemicals in commerce. Congress took this approach because it wanted to ensure that rulemakings that would…
Jun 7, 2016
Protecting innovation and not materially altering the new chemicals process was a critical part of the final compromise. Every effort was made to ensure EPA has the right tools to review new chemical substances but the amendments to this…
Other voices in this conversation
