Political Quotes

David Vitter: In that context, one obvious question is: How does that amnesty provision compare to what is in this 2007 bill? I think…

On the recordMay 24, 2007
In that context, one obvious question is: How does that amnesty provision compare to what is in this 2007 bill? I think if you go down the requirements of the 1986 law and the requirements of this bill before us, you will see they are disturbingly familiar. In 1986, how do you gain temporary residence status? Continuous unlawful residence in the United States since before January 1, 1982. Fees: a $185 fee for the principal applicant, $50 fee for each child, a $420 family cap. You have to meet certain admissibility criteria: 18-month residency period, English language and civics requirement. Those are the basic requirements under that 1986 law. Let's compare it to what is in this bill, which is very similar. The dollar amount fees are higher, more significant, but in terms of the nature of the requirements in this bill, they are disturbingly similar: physically present and employed in the United States since a certain date--January 1, 2007; $1,000 penalty and a $1,500 processing fee; meet admissibility criteria; background check; English language basic requirement, et cetera--the exact same type of requirements under the Z visa provisions of this bill, as well as the 1986 law, which 'Black's Law Dictionary' itself labels amnesty.
Said by
David Vitter
Republican · Louisiana

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the similarities between the 1986 immigration law and the 2007 immigration reform bill.

Share

More from David Vitter

Jun 7, 2016

It was the Congressional intent of the legation to balance the need to ensure public access to health and safety studies with the need to protect from public disclosure valuable confidential business information (CBI) and trade secrets…

govinfo.gov
Sep 12, 2016

I think it was really, unfortunately, underreported in the national news for various reasons.

congress.gov
Jun 7, 2016

I rise also to laud a really significant achievement that we are going to finalize tonight with the final passage of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act. This much needed bill will provide updates that have…

govinfo.gov
Jun 7, 2016

Thank you Senator Inhofe. There are many important provisions of this law and I think clarifying what Congress intended is very important to ensure the legislative intent is understood and followed. To specifically address your first…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation