Essentially, it really seems that you are telling Congress that, unless we pass legislation that will increase the cost of energy, including on low-income families and businesses and schools, then you will be forced, as an agency, to regulate CO2 and unilaterally increase the cost of energy on those same low-income families and businesses and schools.
Editor's note · Context
Vitter expresses concern about the economic impact of EPA regulations on energy costs.
Share
More from David Vitter
I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Foreign Relations be authorized to meet during the session of the Senate on June 16, 2016, at 10:30 a.m., to conduct a hearing entitled ``Our Evolving Understanding and Response to…
We need to get out of this cycle of slashing State funding and replacing it with tuition increases because that can't go on without limit. It really risks affordability.
I rise also to laud a really significant achievement that we are going to finalize tonight with the final passage of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act. This much needed bill will provide updates that have…
You should resign. You should give back the money that you took while this scam was going on.





