Essentially, it really seems that you are telling Congress that, unless we pass legislation that will increase the cost of energy, including on low-income families and businesses and schools, then you will be forced, as an agency, to regulate CO2 and unilaterally increase the cost of energy on those same low-income families and businesses and schools.
Vitter expresses concern about the economic impact of EPA regulations on energy costs.
Share
More from David Vitter
I think it was really, unfortunately, underreported in the national news for various reasons.
Thank you, Senator Inhofe, for those important clarifications to preemption and for another question that is very important to clarify in order to capture the full conngressional intent of the bills preemption section. This Act is intended…
So just as an example, Wells is the biggest participant in the SBA's 7(a) loan program.
Was not this practice, in fact, by the numbers part of the Wells culture by definition because it was so widespread for so long a period of time?
Other voices in this conversation
