On the recordJanuary 29, 2014
I hope you can understand my general concern, which is it took a court order to have the NRC follow a clear legal mandate.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Expressing concern over the NRC's compliance with legal mandates.
Share
More from David Vitter
Jun 16, 2016
I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on the Judiciary be authorized to meet during the session of the Senate on June 16, 2016, at 10 a.m., in room SD-226 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without…
Jun 7, 2016
I rise also to laud a really significant achievement that we are going to finalize tonight with the final passage of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act. This much needed bill will provide updates that have…
Jun 7, 2016
Protecting innovation and not materially altering the new chemicals process was a critical part of the final compromise. Every effort was made to ensure EPA has the right tools to review new chemical substances but the amendments to this…
Jun 7, 2016
That is a very important question and the clear intent of Congress is the answer is yes. This is because, to be legally sufficient according to EPA's own technical assistance, EPA's Section 6(a) rule must ensure that the chemical substance…
Other voices in this conversation
