On the recordJuly 21, 2015
I commend you for working on this legislation and bringing it to the Senate.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Vitter expresses appreciation for the committee's efforts on tax legislation.
Share
More from David Vitter
Jun 7, 2016
That is a very important question and the clear intent of Congress is the answer is yes. This is because, to be legally sufficient according to EPA's own technical assistance, EPA's Section 6(a) rule must ensure that the chemical substance…
Jun 7, 2016
Thank you, Senator Inhofe, for those important clarifications to preemption and for another question that is very important to clarify in order to capture the full conngressional intent of the bills preemption section. This Act is intended…
Dec 5, 2016
I rise today to speak on the Senate floor for the last time. I am not generally big on nostalgic reminiscences, but I would like to briefly reflect on what is clearly the greatest honor of my professional life--my 12 years in the U.S…
Jun 7, 2016
Protecting innovation and not materially altering the new chemicals process was a critical part of the final compromise. Every effort was made to ensure EPA has the right tools to review new chemical substances but the amendments to this…
Other voices in this conversation
