A couple points: I think this is a very useful exchange because I take it from the Senator's comments that the senior Senator is, in fact, one of the folks who has expressed an objection to this moving forward tonight.
Share
More from David Vitter
Thank you, Senator Inhofe, for those important clarifications to preemption and for another question that is very important to clarify in order to capture the full conngressional intent of the bills preemption section. This Act is intended…
We need to get out of this cycle of slashing State funding and replacing it with tuition increases because that can't go on without limit. It really risks affordability.
You should resign. You should give back the money that you took while this scam was going on.
Was not this practice, in fact, by the numbers part of the Wells culture by definition because it was so widespread for so long a period of time?
Other voices in this conversation
