Political Quotes

On the recordSeptember 18, 2013
I hope we are moving to votes on this bill, to votes on our ``no Washington exemption'' language. I certainly continue to encourage that and continue to support that. The reason that is important, particularly on this ``no Washington exemption'' language is because unless we act on October 1, what I think is a completely illegal rule from the Obama administration that does create a special Washington exemption will go into effect. First of all, I think it is very unfortunate, sure is frustrating, that I and others have to be here on the floor blocking an illegal rule in the first place. Because, you see, on this point ObamaCare is clear. The actual statutory language of ObamaCare says clearly that all Members of Congress and their congressional staff go to the exchange. It is crystal clear about that. All of us. In another section, section 1512, it also says clearly any folks going to the exchange lose their employer-based subsidy. That is crystal clear. Chuck Grassley, our distinguished colleague, authored this provision. He could not have been more clear about where he was coming from about the intent. He said at the time, ``The more that Congress experiences the laws it passes, the better.'' He is exactly right. That is what this is all about. That is what that provision is all about.…
Said by
David Vitter
Republican · Louisiana
Source
govinfo.gov
Sep 18, 2013

Share

More from David Vitter

Dec 5, 2016

I thank the Senator from Louisiana for his very kind remarks. More importantly, I want to thank him for years of great partnership, great work on behalf of Louisiana. I know he will make an outstanding senior Senator. Thank you. I yield…

govinfo.gov
Dec 1, 2016

if the majority leader will yield for one moment, I want to thank the majority leader for his very kind words. Serving in the Senate for two terms has been the highest honor of my professional career. I have enjoyed it so much and have…

govinfo.gov
Jun 7, 2016

When TSCA was first enacted in 1976, the Act created a higher level of judicial review for certain rulemakings that would restrict chemicals in commerce. Congress took this approach because it wanted to ensure that rulemakings that would…

govinfo.gov
Jun 7, 2016

That is a very important question and the clear intent of Congress is the answer is yes. This is because, to be legally sufficient according to EPA's own technical assistance, EPA's Section 6(a) rule must ensure that the chemical substance…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation