In 2005 we passed the CF program, which is revenue sharing for States, for coastal conservation and other purposes. Unfortunately, that money has been very slow to get to States. Only 15 percent that was supposed to have been distributed by now has been. This amendment helps fix that. It does not spend new money, it does not increase the deficit.
David Vitter: “In 2005 we passed the CF program, which is revenue sharing for States, for coastal conservation and other purposes.…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the slow distribution of funds from the CF program for coastal conservation.
Share
More from David Vitter
We need tough new laws to hold corporate executives personally accountable, and we need tough prosecutors who have the courage to go after people at the top.
I think it was really, unfortunately, underreported in the national news for various reasons.
Was not this practice, in fact, by the numbers part of the Wells culture by definition because it was so widespread for so long a period of time?
If the majority leader will yield for one moment, I want to thank the majority leader for his very kind words. Serving in the Senate for two terms has been the highest honor of my professional career. I have enjoyed it so much and have…





