No, it is not correct, for the following reason: My amendment, first of all, applies only to Senate spouses lobbying the Senate. It doesn't apply to the House, it doesn't apply to Federal agencies, it doesn't apply to State legislatures. It doesn't apply to all sorts of other things. To be quite honest and direct, I would like to have it apply more broadly to all of Congress, but to make my amendment germane, I have to forgo that. I think that is a direct answer to the Senator's question.
David Vitter: “No, it is not correct, for the following reason: My amendment, first of all, applies only to Senate spouses lobbying the…”
Editor's note · Context
Responding to a question about the scope of his amendment regarding lobbying by Senate spouses.
Share
More from David Vitter
Thank you, Senator Inhofe, for those important clarifications to preemption and for another question that is very important to clarify in order to capture the full conngressional intent of the bills preemption section. This Act is intended…
We need to get out of this cycle of slashing State funding and replacing it with tuition increases because that can't go on without limit. It really risks affordability.
If the majority leader will yield for one moment, I want to thank the majority leader for his very kind words. Serving in the Senate for two terms has been the highest honor of my professional career. I have enjoyed it so much and have…
I think it was really, unfortunately, underreported in the national news for various reasons.





