On the recordNovember 8, 2009
I am also cognizant that the EPA should not be under the impression that this legislation expands EPA authority over Gulf of Mexico resources.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Vitter clarifies that the legislation does not increase EPA's regulatory power.
Share
More from David Vitter
Dec 5, 2016
I rise today to speak on the Senate floor for the last time. I am not generally big on nostalgic reminiscences, but I would like to briefly reflect on what is clearly the greatest honor of my professional life--my 12 years in the U.S…
Sep 19, 2016
Why isn't this crystal clear proof that an entity as big as Wells is not only too big to fail, but it is too big to manage and it is too big to regulate?
Jun 16, 2016
I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Foreign Relations be authorized to meet during the session of the Senate on June 16, 2016, at 10:30 a.m., to conduct a hearing entitled ``Our Evolving Understanding and Response to…
Jun 7, 2016
Protecting innovation and not materially altering the new chemicals process was a critical part of the final compromise. Every effort was made to ensure EPA has the right tools to review new chemical substances but the amendments to this…
Other voices in this conversation
