Cutting and limiting the use of DERA funding, which has shown a consistent high return on its investment--for every $1 invested, we get over $13 in health and economic benefits in return--just doesn't make sense.
Vitter argues against cuts to DERA funding due to its high return on investment.
Share
More from David Vitter
Why isn't this crystal clear proof that an entity as big as Wells is not only too big to fail, but it is too big to manage and it is too big to regulate?
I thank the Senator from Louisiana for his very kind remarks. More importantly, I want to thank him for years of great partnership, great work on behalf of Louisiana. I know he will make an outstanding senior Senator. Thank you. I yield…
You should resign. You should give back the money that you took while this scam was going on.
So just as an example, Wells is the biggest participant in the SBA's 7(a) loan program.
Other voices in this conversation
