Cutting and limiting the use of DERA funding, which has shown a consistent high return on its investment--for every $1 invested, we get over $13 in health and economic benefits in return--just doesn't make sense.
Vitter argues against cuts to DERA funding due to its high return on investment.
Share
More from David Vitter
Thank you Senator Inhofe. There are many important provisions of this law and I think clarifying what Congress intended is very important to ensure the legislative intent is understood and followed. To specifically address your first…
It was the Congressional intent of the legation to balance the need to ensure public access to health and safety studies with the need to protect from public disclosure valuable confidential business information (CBI) and trade secrets…
I rise today to discuss a really outrageous abuse of power on the part of Members of this body, Members of the House, Washington officials in general. While imposing ObamaCare on everyone else, officials in Washington have largely exempted…
The only way that Wall Street will change is if executives face jail time when they preside over massive frauds.
Other voices in this conversation
