On the recordMarch 8, 2010
If the EPA decides to use any given study as a reason for limiting of terminating the use of a certain chemical, the results of that study need to be repeatable and proven in further supporting studies.
Source
congress.govIf the EPA decides to use any given study as a reason for limiting of terminating the use of a certain chemical, the results of that study need to be repeatable and proven in further supporting studies.
Emphasizing the need for repeatable scientific studies in chemical regulation.
Share
More from David Vitter
Why isn't this crystal clear proof that an entity as big as Wells is not only too big to fail, but it is too big to manage and it is too big to regulate?
The only way that Wall Street will change is if executives face jail time when they preside over massive frauds.
Thank you, Senator Inhofe, for those important clarifications to preemption and for another question that is very important to clarify in order to capture the full conngressional intent of the bills preemption section. This Act is intended…
So just as an example, Wells is the biggest participant in the SBA's 7(a) loan program.