On the recordFebruary 2, 2011
I think a European registration, evaluation and authorization of chemical substances, a REACH-style program, would threaten to kill innovation in the United States.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Vitter argues that REACH-style programs could hinder U.S. innovation.
Share
More from David Vitter
Jun 7, 2016
That is an important question Senator Inhofe and I appreciate the opportunity to clarify. The Lautenberg bill tries to address the concern about forcing paralysis by analysis in several ways. First, the bill establishes that `unreasonable…
Jun 7, 2016
That is a very important question and the clear intent of Congress is the answer is yes. This is because, to be legally sufficient according to EPA's own technical assistance, EPA's Section 6(a) rule must ensure that the chemical substance…
Jun 7, 2016
Thank you Senator Inhofe, the sound science provisions were a critical part of TSCA reform in my opinion and I hope this bill serves as a model for how to responsibly reform other laws administered by EPA and other Federal Agencies that…
Jun 7, 2016
When TSCA was first enacted in 1976, the Act created a higher level of judicial review for certain rulemakings that would restrict chemicals in commerce. Congress took this approach because it wanted to ensure that rulemakings that would…
Other voices in this conversation
