On the recordApril 27, 2015
This amendment would duplicate that work and would be a major power grab by EPA and a major change to put into their jurisdiction something which is completely outside their scope.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Vitter opposes the amendment, arguing it overreaches EPA's authority.
Share
More from David Vitter
Jun 29, 2016
I rise today to discuss a really outrageous abuse of power on the part of Members of this body, Members of the House, Washington officials in general. While imposing ObamaCare on everyone else, officials in Washington have largely exempted…
Sep 19, 2016
Was not this practice, in fact, by the numbers part of the Wells culture by definition because it was so widespread for so long a period of time?
Jun 7, 2016
Protecting innovation and not materially altering the new chemicals process was a critical part of the final compromise. Every effort was made to ensure EPA has the right tools to review new chemical substances but the amendments to this…
Sep 7, 2016
I rise today to highlight the importance and urgent need of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 and the urgent need to bring it to the Senate floor and to act and pass it in the Senate. Unfortunately, there are many events, floods…
Other voices in this conversation
