On the recordApril 27, 2015
This amendment would duplicate that work and would be a major power grab by EPA and a major change to put into their jurisdiction something which is completely outside their scope.
Source
congress.govDavid Vitter: “This amendment would duplicate that work and would be a major power grab by EPA and a major change to put into their…”
Editor's note · Context
Vitter opposes the amendment, arguing it overreaches EPA's authority.
Share
More from David Vitter
Sep 19, 2016
Why isn't this crystal clear proof that an entity as big as Wells is not only too big to fail, but it is too big to manage and it is too big to regulate?
Jun 7, 2016
Thank you, Senator Inhofe, for those important clarifications to preemption and for another question that is very important to clarify in order to capture the full conngressional intent of the bills preemption section. This Act is intended…
Sep 19, 2016
You should resign. You should give back the money that you took while this scam was going on.
Dec 1, 2016
If the majority leader will yield for one moment, I want to thank the majority leader for his very kind words. Serving in the Senate for two terms has been the highest honor of my professional career. I have enjoyed it so much and have…
Other voices in this conversation
