David Vitter: “I want to underscore two things.”

Thank you, Senator Inhofe, for those important clarifications to preemption and for another question that is very important to clarify in order to capture the full conngressional intent of the bills preemption section. This Act is intended…

We need to get out of this cycle of slashing State funding and replacing it with tuition increases because that can't go on without limit. It really risks affordability.

I think it was really, unfortunately, underreported in the national news for various reasons.

Was not this practice, in fact, by the numbers part of the Wells culture by definition because it was so widespread for so long a period of time?