On the recordJune 8, 2010
The point is that we need a permanent revision of the law, but there is clearly disagreement about how to do that.
Source
congress.govDavid Vitter: “The point is that we need a permanent revision of the law, but there is clearly disagreement about how to do that.”
Editor's note · Context
Vitter emphasizes the need for a permanent law revision amid disagreements.
Share
More from David Vitter
Sep 19, 2016
Why isn't this crystal clear proof that an entity as big as Wells is not only too big to fail, but it is too big to manage and it is too big to regulate?
Sep 19, 2016
The only way that Wall Street will change is if executives face jail time when they preside over massive frauds.
Jun 29, 2016
Thank you, Mr. President. I yield the floor. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Lee). The Senator from Texas. Zika Virus Funding
Sep 19, 2016
Was not this practice, in fact, by the numbers part of the Wells culture by definition because it was so widespread for so long a period of time?
Other voices in this conversation
