On the recordSeptember 15, 2010
No economic analysis of consequence was done prior to that dramatic decision?
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Questioning the lack of economic analysis before the moratorium decision.
Share
More from David Vitter
Jun 7, 2016
That is a very important question and the clear intent of Congress is the answer is yes. This is because, to be legally sufficient according to EPA's own technical assistance, EPA's Section 6(a) rule must ensure that the chemical substance…
Jun 16, 2016
I ask unanimous consent that the Select Committee on Intelligence be authorized to meet during the session of the Senate on June 16, 2016, at 9 a.m., in room SH-216 of the Hart Senate Office Building. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without…
Jun 7, 2016
That is an important question Senator Inhofe and I appreciate the opportunity to clarify. The Lautenberg bill tries to address the concern about forcing paralysis by analysis in several ways. First, the bill establishes that `unreasonable…
May 26, 2016
we rise together with so many other Members of the Senate on a bipartisan basis to strongly support the chemical safety bill which passed the U.S. House of Representatives with enormous bipartisan support and is ready to pass here in the…
Other voices in this conversation
