On the recordApril 27, 2015
I am going to urge a no vote on this well intended amendment. This would alter the fundamental compromise in this bill.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Vitter opposes the amendment, arguing it disrupts the bipartisan compromise on chemical regulation.
Share
More from David Vitter
Sep 21, 2016
I rise to honor two of my longest serving staff members who have been tremendous team leaders in our office: David Doss, my State director, and Nicole Hebert, my deputy State director. They are both, sadly, departing the Senate later this…
Sep 19, 2016
So just as an example, Wells is the biggest participant in the SBA's 7(a) loan program.
Jun 7, 2016
Thank you Senator Inhofe, the sound science provisions were a critical part of TSCA reform in my opinion and I hope this bill serves as a model for how to responsibly reform other laws administered by EPA and other Federal Agencies that…
Jun 16, 2016
I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Armed Services be authorized to meet during the session of the Senate on June 16, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. committee on foreign relations
Other voices in this conversation
