I am going to urge a no vote on this well intended amendment. This would alter the fundamental compromise in this bill.
David Vitter: “I am going to urge a no vote on this well intended amendment. This would alter the fundamental compromise in this bill.”
Editor's note · Context
Vitter opposes the amendment, arguing it disrupts the bipartisan compromise on chemical regulation.
Share
More from David Vitter
We need tough new laws to hold corporate executives personally accountable, and we need tough prosecutors who have the courage to go after people at the top.
I think it was really, unfortunately, underreported in the national news for various reasons.
I thank the Senator from Louisiana for his very kind remarks. More importantly, I want to thank him for years of great partnership, great work on behalf of Louisiana. I know he will make an outstanding senior Senator. Thank you. I yield…
Thank you, Senator Inhofe, for those important clarifications to preemption and for another question that is very important to clarify in order to capture the full conngressional intent of the bills preemption section. This Act is intended…





