David Vitter said...

I am going to urge a no vote on this well intended amendment. This would alter the fundamental compromise in this bill.

Vitter opposes the amendment, arguing it disrupts the bipartisan compromise on chemical regulation.

04/27/2015

More David Vitter Quotes

I think we should be forced to follow the law, and it was OPM, under pressure from Members of Congress and the Administr...

Thank you, Chairman Inhofe and Ranking Member Boxer, for holding this very important hearing on the Water Resources and ...

I do question the conflict of interest between people who are named over and over and over as trustees, make a lot of mo...

I remain unconvinced that allowing an OPM entity, whether its name be FIS or NBIB, is the correct path in the long term.