The science and economic consequences and legal underpinnings of the EPA's actions to advance the President's climate action plan are topics the Administration does not want to discuss in detail.
Editor's note · Context
Vitter criticizes the Administration's reluctance to discuss the implications of EPA's climate actions.
Share
More from David Vitter
I thank the Senator from Louisiana for his very kind remarks. More importantly, I want to thank him for years of great partnership, great work on behalf of Louisiana. I know he will make an outstanding senior Senator. Thank you. I yield…
I ask unanimous consent that since Senator Inhofe and I will speak on the same important topic, we speak back to back for up to 15 minutes total. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection? Without objection, it is so ordered. Frank R…
I rise also to laud a really significant achievement that we are going to finalize tonight with the final passage of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act. This much needed bill will provide updates that have…
Protecting innovation and not materially altering the new chemicals process was a critical part of the final compromise. Every effort was made to ensure EPA has the right tools to review new chemical substances but the amendments to this…





