In 2014, the Department of Energy announced plans to import highly enriched liquid nuclear waste into the country via the busiest northern border crossing and through a major metropolitan area. This route was approved 20 years ago, pursuant to a pre-9/11 analysis, and for a less dangerous type of nuclear waste. Yet, the Department has refused to undertake a contemporary environmental review or threat assessment. In response, this House passed legislation by a vote of 416-0, requiring a threat assessment of a potential terror attack on such cargo. Yet, the Department of Energy announced that it intends to ignore the clear will of this House and authorize 150 truck shipments this year without conducting the threat assessment this House demanded. Mr. Speaker, this route was a bad idea when it was first approved 20 years ago. Disregarding the terror threat, which has increased since then, is dangerously negligent, and we will not stand by while our communities are at risk. ____________________
On the recordJanuary 7, 2016
Share
More from Clay Higgins
Dec 9, 2024
I am looking forward to working with your office personally. Let us just resolve that issue.
Jun 26, 2025
What is it that the Democrats don't want the American people to know? It is a legitimate consideration that the citizenry from sea to shining sea should ask themselves right now. What exactly is the problem? They say again and again, oh…
Nov 12, 2024
I support the bill, Mr. Speaker, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Higgins) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R…
Jul 4, 2026
The 17th Amendment is arguably the most injurious amendment in history. Big money has twisted our Senate races into circus acts.





