There is bipartisan, bicameral, universal support for a marriage penalty tax deduction or tax decrease. The President has it in his budget, the Democrats have it in their recommittal substitute that we will see tomorrow, the Republicans have it. Truly this debate that we are having here today, and that we will have tomorrow, is not about a marriage penalty. Everyone agrees, everyone has a plan. We will talk about the differences in the plans, but everyone agrees that there needs to be a correction. It was an unintentional glitch in a tax law that happened several or many years ago. So I think that the true debate is about how do we go about it?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing bipartisan support for a marriage penalty tax deduction during a floor debate.
Share
More from Christopher John
Why would we encourage the construction and operation of more oil and gas wells in U.S. waters than are necessary?
After more than a decade, it is time for the federal government to settle this outstanding obligation and, at the same time, protect the rights of my home State.
it is with true pleasure that I stand up here today to talk about a program that is so important to America, and that is our Social Security program. I come from southwest Louisiana, Cajun country, bordered on the west by the State of…
I congratulate both the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Tauzin), chairman of the full committee, and the ranking member, the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Dingell), and also the subcommittee chairman and ranking member, the gentleman from…





