Instead of revoking negative stereotypes to justify cuts under an artificial price control formula, Congress ought to consider the real injustice the formula imposes on patients, such as an 85-year-old caregiver who has to wait longer and drive further so her ailing husband can visit a physician. While Medicare does not force providers to treat Medicare patients, especially when the cost of providing care exceeds declining payments, for seniors who turn 65, it is Medicare or no care. It is virtually impossible for someone at age 65 to find insurance coverage for physician services outside of Medicare part B. Medicare needs to honor its commitment, and seniors need more than access to a waiting list.
Charles Boustany: “Instead of revoking negative stereotypes to justify cuts under an artificial price control formula, Congress ought to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of Medicare payment cuts on patients and providers.
Share
More from Charles Boustany
This is an absolutely essential amendment because we need more transparency about methods and how these assumptions are built into what they are proposing. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Loudermilk).
AMR supports and urges the Committee to consider H.R. 4689, 'The Timely Payment for Veterans' Emergency Care Act' sponsored by Congressman Boustany.
I have no other Members wishing to speak on the bill, and I am prepared to close. I reserve the balance of my time.
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 3, line 13, strike ``; and'' and insert a semicolon. Page 3, line 15, strike the period at the end and…





