right now we are debating the Great American Outdoors Act, which would be great if only it were balanced. My problem with the Great American Outdoors Act is that it spends billions on places where we vacation, but the authors of the bill would not allow a few million to be spent to protect the places where we live and we work and we help create livelihoods for many. There is an amendment that would do that that is bipartisan and that would not take any money away from the billions that the bill is already allocating for those places where we vacation. First, let me kind of make my point. Forty-two percent of Americans live in a county or parish adjacent to a coastline--42 percent. Eighty- five percent of Americans live in a coastal State. But of the billions that go into the Great American Outdoors Act, of those billions, 50 to close to 60 percent are spent in seven States, seven localities, and if you exclude Washington, DC, and areas around Washington, it is not spent on coastal areas. We are spending billions on places where we go to vacation, but the authors of the bill will not allow millions to be spent to protect where we live. That is foolish public policy. We should be investing in coastal resiliency. Now, of course, the irony is, we are going to spend billions on the coast. Why? We have seen it.…
On the recordJune 10, 2020
Share
More from Bill Cassidy
Aug 18, 2026
The policy that the president just put forward is going to decrease immunization rates aside from being less convenient and costing families more.
Aug 18, 2026
People can draw their own conclusions, but it’s pretty evident that that was the White House and the RFK pledge — RFK may say, technically this is the president, not him, and technically he’s right
Aug 17, 2026
Let’s just take it from the perspective of the parent: now instead of going to the doctor twice to get their child vaccinated, they have to go six times.
Aug 18, 2026
There are guarantees that were given to me and guarantees that were supposedly going to be enforced by the White House. Among those were not to affect the [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] schedule





