Political Quotes

“the Supreme Court is about to rule on King v. Burwell. This decision is a question of a plain reading of the law, which is that subsidies shall only be given to those who reside in States which have established State exchanges. That is the plain reading of the law. The administration maintains that, no, ``States'' doesn't mean ``States,'' but, rather, it can be an exchange set up either by the State or the Federal Government. Presuming the Supreme Court decides that a plain reading of the law is correct--that for a resident of a State to receive a subsidy, they have to reside in a State that has established an exchange--there are 37 States in which those currently receiving subsidies will lose their subsidies. This is important because under ObamaCare we have seen a dramatic increase in the cost of health insurance premiums. So many people who formerly would have been able to afford an insurance premium no longer can without the subsidy. What this means for that person in a State such as Louisiana is there will be someone in the middle of chemotherapy who can no longer afford their insurance without a subsidy. The insurance has been made so high because of ObamaCare that that patient is no longer able to afford her insurance and she is at risk of losing her coverage because the administration illegally implemented the law. This is where we are going into the Supreme Court decision. Let me kind of now start on a different tack.…”