I said I would be an impartial juror. Anyone listening to those arguments, the House managers were focused. They were organized. They relied upon both precedent, the Constitution, and legal scholars. They made a compelling argument. President Trump`s team were disorganized. They did everything they could but to talk about the question at hand. And when they talked about it, they kind of glided over it, almost as if they were embarrassed of their arguments. If I`m an impartial juror and one side is doing a great job and the other side is doing a terrible job, on the issue at hand, as an impartial juror, I`m going to vote for the side that did the good job.
Editor's note · Context
Senator Cassidy explains why he changed his vote to support the trial against Trump, highlighting the effectiveness of the House managers' arguments compared to Trump's defense team.
Share
More from Bill Cassidy
The claim ‘vaccines do not cause autism’ is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.
That's totally wrong. No American should be targeted by the law, but no American should be above the law.
While I respect Dr. Overton’s experience as a physician, I have strong concerns about her nomination to be FDA commissioner.
I am concerned that IAM Union member dues are financing efforts to change U.S. policy related to the Cuban regime, a State Sponsor of Terror, instead of supporting American workers’ priorities.





